1. Time: 1987 or 1988;
2. Place: (1) the United Nations Headquarter in New York City, assembly session forum; (2) a private house in Taipei County, conducting a UN opinion survey from a distance;
(1) David Chang: the UN Abused Case child;
(2) Melody Chang: the sister of David Chang and the dropped-out high school girl when Madam Chiang Soong Mei-Ling was the principal of that Taipei City Private Xiai-Sing High School;
(3) Ms. Chu Chen: the UN Child Abuse Case witness and reporter, previously the student of National Cheng-Chi University, and then the Legislator assistant and also via Japanese authority to be the United Nations office liaison.
4. Case briefing:
In 1987 or 1988, at an assembly session forum of United Nations, in the New York City, Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling was testifying for the human rights or civil rights abuse case which in that violating the rights of a teenager girl at Taipei County who was forced dropped out from high school while Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling was as that high school’s principal. That was intended to testify for the medical improper practice of Taiwanese psychotherapy system violating that young girl’s civil rights, or human rights, along with the violating from Mr George W. Bush represented USA reading-auxiliary machine company when Mr Bush Jr. served as the public relationship manager, and the UN liaison Ms Chu Chen acted as his colleague at the moment. Ms Chu Chen graduated from National Cheng Chi University(NCCU) who later went to the Congress as the assistant of the Tainan City born Legislator Shru-Chen Wu, when the USA reading auxiliary machine company had bankrupted previously. Another customer of that USA reading auxiliary machine company was the Taipei Citizen Mrs. Fun-Yu Lien, who was also alleged to be involved in this case, for there were only these two machines sold from that USA reading auxiliary machine company at Taiwan. During the assembly session forum, the chairman decided to seek a sampling opinion survey about this testifying case from Taiwanese citizen, from a distance observing…
The United Nations Child Abuse Case of David Chang was happened in 1977, the infant child in the Taipei County Hope Grammar School, was pushed from back to fall down and hit the ground to lose his two front teeth. That was reported by the young Yale Law School student Ms Hillary Rodham. But the rapport between the USA and the ROC was breaking down in 1978, Ms Hillary Rodham then transferred this child abuse case to Ms Chu Chen of the NCCU student who had served as the witness of the abuse child case. Perhaps this young NCCU student Ms Chu Chen had been suppressed by the cruel international political environment, she sort of showing apathy to this UN child abuse case David Chang and his family, in which there were a UN case abused child, an adopted family grown up mother, and a high school dropped out sister.
Back to the 1987 or 1988 United Nations assembly session forum, when Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling making a testifying to the forum and the chairman decided to seek an opinion survey from Taiwanese citizen, in a distance. At Taipei City the United Nations opinion survey call was received by Ms Chu Chen, who seemed to be via the channel of Japanese to assume some privilege to answer that UN call. Ms Chu Chen directly assigned her child abuse case David Chang for the survey, who at the moment attended Taipei First High School, or Taipei Municipal Chen-Kuo High School. Ms Chu Chen obviously set aside some Woman Associate member who reminded her that Municipal Chen-Kuo High School student David Chang was the dropped-out high school girl Melody’s brother, which case was under testifying in the UN. Ms Chu Chen said that she was giving this low social class Taipei First High School student Mr David Chang a chance to express himself in the United Nation assembly session forum. But as notified along with this case, it was also said that Ms Chu Chen grabbed this UN survey assignment because she had confidence through the Japanese operating crew and through the Taiwanese partners who were familiar to the machine product, the access to the dialogue content of this child David Chang, which was to be delivered to the United Nations testifying forum, would be more easily manipulated than the access to other citizens. It was only for Ms Chu Chen’s own interests to grab that UN survey for manipulating the dialogue to avoid the UN forum testifying accusation of the misdeeds caused by Ms Chu Chen’s reading auxiliary machine and membership fees collecting. Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling at the UN forum did not aware that Municipal Chen-Kuo High School student who offered the survey opinion was exactly the brother of the improper psychotherapy system victim and her high school dropped out girl Melody Chang. The survey opinion offered by this high school student David Chang, he did not know what authority had such an opinion for submission and he did not know what authority would review this opinion and what action would followed this survey. Under such double-blinded condition, this high school student David Chang of that medical improper practice case Melody Chang’s brother had a submission to say that country girls such as his sister Melody Chang who went to Taipei City and studied in the city public library(which David Chang referred clearly to the National Central Library, located at #20 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei City) would surely suffer the attack from the urban discriminating activists to suburb residents. The Taipei First High School student David Chang also mentioned in the UN opinion survey that such discrimination and harassing attack from the urban activists to the suburb residents was including the discrimination to where his sister Melody Chang was born, the southern Taiwan Chia-Yi City.
Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling after half an hour started getting to know this Taipei Municipal High School student arranged by Ms Chu Chen to take the UN opinion survey for human rights violation under testifying, was exactly Melody’s brother David Chang. Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling seriously told this young Taipei First High School second grade student that she had a very important meeting in the UN assembly forum, and “your opinion would be hindering Madam her business and against this nation’s interests or our common interests.” But the psychotherapy process of his sister Melody Chang and the local politics dynamics had made this David’s heart hardened, David did not want to change his opinion. Therefore, Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling asked Taipei “to take care of this opinion delivered from such Taipei Municipal High School student.” This anonymous reporting task from some United Nations office was received by Ms Chu Chen through the Japanese authority to be as a liaison. Ms Chu Chen quickly reported her former victim of UN Child Abuse Case the high school student seventeen years old Mr David Chang, to be the new “Provocative Trouble Maker” in the new United Nations file, sir.
When Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling realized hours later that this David Chang who delivered the survey opinion was exactly the brother of Melody Chang, the victim of her human rights case under testifying in the UN forum, Madam Chiang demanded the Taipei Woman Associate office to recover the report previously sent to the United Nations liaison office. Ms Chu Chen was apparently expressing her unwillingness for cooperation with the testifying Madam Chiang. Because that was only against Ms Chu Chen’s business interests of the reading auxiliary machine and membership fee collecting. That was a huge interests.
To replace the previous Child Abuse Case of six years old infant David Chang, the new United Nations files of seventeen years old high school student David Chang were kept in two parts separately: one filed by Madam Chiang Soong Mei-ling, testifying to the UN assembly forum for improper psychotherapy system human rights violations; one filed by Ms Chu Chen, secretly through Japanese liaison channel to the United Nations office, for the seventeen years old “Provocative Trouble Maker.” Because the files were kept separately, the activists of interests group from United Nations Health Organization system would harass that “Provocative Trouble Maker” high school student David Chang, while the activists of interests group from the abuse child case or reading auxiliary machine membership system, would harass that “Madam Chiang’s high school girl” Melody Chang of David Chang’s sister. Therefore, such a human rights filed case of United Nations would have two pressure groups exerting their force upon the very “Low Social Class” family members, a well meaning United Nations case to the brother and sister but finally violating their human rights and civil rights separately. In which case the “low social class” rhetoric was dubbed by Ms Chu Chen when the UN opinion survey was conducted. That is why such a well meaning civil rights case or human rights case through these years becomes so complex and so ridiculous.
David C.K. Chang,
December 10, 2010,
National Central Library,