Date： 099/12/16 @ 13:26
TO： Judicial Yuan
Name： David CK Chang
Title： Quid Pro Quo and Civil Law (The enclosure of 2006 Postal Certificate letter sending to Taipei District Court Judge Liu Ting-Boer)
Dear Chief Justice Mr Hao-Ming Rai:
The Panchiao Citizen of Taipei County, Mr David Chang, from 2004 through 2010 stayed at the National Central Library (the former National Chung-Young Library) investigating the harassment cases suffered by many citizens or visiting guests. Last submission to the Judicial Yuan official concerns the USA Sergeant Ms Eva Ivory dropped death case on August 14, 1994 in Bei-Tou area of Taipei City. In addition to that Sgt. Eva’s case, on August 15, 1994, a Canadian female white second lieutenant military officer also committed suicide in the toilet of the National Central Library during the same military exercise period, when the library was under military occupation to have some offensive practice to harass the citizens which came to the library but were not informed about that military exercise. This Canadian military officer’s case hereby is submitted with the previous USA Sergeant Eva Ivory’s case, sir. As far as I know, the official record of this National Central Library security guard police team in 1994 was having a direct report of this female Canadian military officer suicide case submitted to the visiting delegates of USA Congress members but was denied by the USA official.
As to the law analysis, the Republic of China Constitution Article 2 imposes a rule that citizen body of ROC proclaims the sovereignty of the Republic of China. Because the specific citizen constitutional rights of Republic of China was outlawed with the judicial power, it is violating Article 2 of the Constitution. But at that time the government authority invoked the Civil Code of ROC Article 149 to justify the infringement for national defense needs to guard the rights of his own or another, and at that time the government authority also invoked the Civil Code of ROC Article 150 to justify the infringement for avoiding imminent danger menacing the life, body, liberty, or property of himself or another. For this justification of governmental authority of specific citizen constitutional rights infringement, I argue that we could refer to the fact that the USA Presidents have never signed the Geneva Protocol about the war prisoners(International Herald Tribune, 2007) to have an example for us to decide the involving parties of the quid pro quo issue for civil law compensation, calculating the money amount which would be collected from such involving parties. The National Chiao Tung University graduated student Mr David Chang, myself, from 1993 through 2010, has been verifying such governmental legal environment and that the specific citizen constitutional rights is outlawed for 16 years to be against the Constitution law Article 2. Therefore, such an observing fact of governmental legal environment could be set as an assumption to deduce the follow-up logic reasoning to support a Panchiao Wen-Hua Road Branch Postal Office registered Certificate Letter, No.10011, which was sent by Mr David Chang, me, to the Taipei District Court Judge Liu Ting-Boer and which has already arrived at the Taipei District Court Judge Liu Ting-Boer in June 2006. The enclosure of a one page A4-size document of that postal certificate letter No.10011 sent to the Taipei District Court Judge Liu Ting-Boer, describing the quid pro quo issue of civil law compensation claims to calculate the award amount of NTD$20,000,000 as a base to multiply a factor which lies between 10 and 100 times compensating for financial loss, pain and suffering. If we follow the example of the USA Presidents to exempt the Geneva Protocol about the definition about prisoner of war, to calculate the civil law compensation of involving parties, that is, the prisoners of war include civilians who have non-combat support roles with the military offense, the parties for compensation money collecting may be including the assistant of congress legislator, the library civilian administrative staff, the university student council and representatives, the public university faculty member or the librarian, the non-military social order keeping police armed force(the National Police Agency and Taipei City Police Department), and so on. These parties were serving from 2004 to 2005 as the accomplice of the military offense of infringement happened in National Central Library to damage the specific citizens constitutional rights.
Another aspect of such a civil law compensation case was complicated. In August of 1996 the Nationalist Party(KMT party) Executive Yuan Chief, Premier Lien Chan’s spouse Mrs Lien Fun-Yee was in New York City, together with Democratic Progressive Party(DPP) former legislator Mrs Wu Shru-chen of Taipei City Mayor Mr Chen Shui-bian’ s wife, to testify to the FBI and federal officials for how Sgt. Eva Ivory was affected in Taipei City to drop dead by the two reading auxiliary machines which was sold by a public relationship manager Mr George W. Bush in 1970s to Mrs Lien Fun-Yee and Mrs Wu Shru-chen. The death USA Sgt Eva Ivory had a sister, the lieutenant military officer Ms Eva Ivory(Liet. Eva), together with Liet Eva’s mother under the democracy system of United States of America, Lieutenant Ms Eva Ivory’s mother was asking then Texas Governor George W. Bush and then White House First Lady Mrs Hillary R. Clinton to testify to the FBI and investigating military officials(or congress officials), for their activity connecting to Sgt. Eva Ivory’s death case in August of 1994. Before August 2, 1996 the CUNY Baruch College school opening day, premier Lien’s spouse Mrs Lien Fun-Yee told the FBI and investigating official that she could herself decided that the CUNY Baruch College business graduate school student Mr David Chang who was the former Panchiao Military Police Station second lieutenant officer of Taipei to be the one to testify for what Texas Governor Mr George W. Bush and the White House First Lady Mrs Hillary R. Clinton did at Taipei City in August of 1994 when they were visiting Taipei for a military exercise and weapon purchase show. I was that military police second lieutenant officer David Chang, staying in New York City with an F1 student Visa of the City University Baruch Graduate Business School in August of 1996, I did not give any form of consent to that testifying to the FBI or USA military investigating official of Mr Texas Governor or Mrs White House First Lady in August 1994 of Taipei military exercise activity. The Liet. Eva Ivory and her mother were asking the military investigating official to replicate the so-called “military credit” issue of Sgt. Eva Ivory done at Taipei, plus the premier spouse Mrs Lien Fun-Yee decided by herself to make me, Mr David Chang, the one to testify for a special case of the USA apex officials Texas Governor Mr George W. Bush and USA President First Lady Mrs Hillary R. Clinton of their activities related to the Sgt. Eva Ivory’s death case in 1994 on Taipei military exercise occasion. For such known circumstances, to be sure was that happened within tens of hours, my grandmother died from the intended medical errors at Veteran General Hospital of Taipei City. I am not quite sure that if Mrs Lien Fun-Yee of premier Lien’s spouse had acquired the consents from my father Mr Chang Cheng-chi by his nodding head or any kind of that. About this we have to take a further step to make sure with my father Mr Chang Cheng-chi or former premier Lien’s spouse Mrs Lien Fun-Yee, sir.
Panchiao Citizen David CK Chang,
National Central Library,
Translated by DB, Dec. 28, 2010, National Central Library, Taipei City