Remarks, the appeal to the Supreme Court on June 11 2013

Supreme Court Prosecutors OfficeRemarks, the appeal to the Supreme Court on June 11 2013

This statement in Chinese(optional) was the testimony of 1983 rape case happened at the Hai-Shan Junior High School, Taipei County, that Ms Chiu Shu-Chen was raped by Mr Liao Cheng-han. This testimony had not been submitted in person to the law court by the witness Mr David CK Chang before, because the witness was twelve years old and underage thirty years ago. The witness Mr David Chang’s mother Mrs Wu Yu-Shing appeared in the law court instead, on behalf of the underage witness Mr David Chang.

The appeal to the Supreme Court on June 11, 2013 of the 101 Savant Yi 2318 Libel Case of Breeze Liao Cheng-han was focused on the fact that because the defendant Mr David Chang thirty years ago was the district law court summoned witness of the criminal case Mr Liao Cheng-han raping Ms Chiu Shu-Chen, thus it was not simply within the district court and high court’s own discretion to claim the Criminal Procedural Code Provision 158 to judge against the fact that Mr Liao Cheng-han raped Ms Chiu Shu-Chen to have an illegitimate daughter Ms Liao Yu-Wen, and therefore the defendant Mr David Chang appealed to the Supreme Court to invalidate the process for the reason of violating Criminal Procedural Code Provision 1.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s